38. Maenpaa, Age. & Jalovaara, M. (2013). The effects off homogamy within the socio-monetary record and studies into changeover out-of cohabitation in order to relationships. Acta Sociologica , 56 (3), 247-263.
39. Oprisan, Elizabeth., & Cristea, D. (2012). A number of details regarding dictate about concept of relationship pleasure. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences , , 33 , 468-472.
A good longitudinal analysis regarding fret spillover in marriage: Do spousal support adequacy boundary the results?
40. Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent endure – Identity similarities within the lovers. Identification and you will Private Variations , forty-five (6), 533-535.
We be prepared to find variations one of analyzed nations, because they provides diffe book sociocultural standing, and additionally differences based in the personal issues that get influence on brand new balance within the relationship
43. Ruppanner, L., Bernhardt, E., & Branden, Yards. (2017). Office regarding cleaning along with his along with her view of housework fairness: A typology of Swedish couples. Market Research , 36 , 501-524.
forty-two. Russell, R. J. H., & Wells, P. (1993). Relationships and the Relashionship Questionnaire: MARQ Handbook . Sevenoaks: Hodder and you may Stoughton.
forty five. Russell, R. J. H. & Wells, P. (1991). Character resemblance and you may top-notch relationships. Character and you may Individual Variations , a dozen (5), 407-412.
47. Russell, R.J.H. & Wells, P.Good. (1994b). Continue reading “Assortative coordinating one of same-sex as well as other-sex couples in the us, 1990-2000”